Sources: ‘Panzertruppen’ vol2, ‘Sledgehammers: Strengths and Flaws of Tiger Tank Battalions in World War II’, ‘Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933 – 1945’ In the period 1943-45 we have 6,132 Panthers which can be compared to 6,686 Pz IV and 1,761 Tigers. Panther production on the other hand was substantial. The Tiger I and King Tiger tanks were built in small numbers. The goal was to completely reequip the Panzer divisions with the Panther as the main vehicle but due to production shortfalls each division had one battalion equipped with the Pz IV and one with the Panther.Ģ). The Panther on the other hand was used in the standard Panzer Divisions. These units were small (about 45 tanks) and were used at the points of main effort. Heavy tanks like the Tiger were used in specialized Heavy Tank Battalions (Schwere Panzer- Abteilung). There are two reasons why the German classification of the Panther as a medium tank is correct:ġ). However whether a tank was classified as a medium or heavy was dependent on its role in the battlefield. So in that sense the Panther was a heavy vehicle. The Panther was also considerably heavier than the standard German medium tanks Pz III (23t) and Pz IV (25t). In terms of weight the Panther at ~45t was definitely heavier than the Sherman and the T-34 (28-33t depending on the model). Was the Panther a ‘heavy’ tank? Should it be compared to the Allied mediums or with their heavy tanks? I’ve seen online and also in books statements of the type ‘well the Panther tank was better than the M4 Sherman and the T-34 but it was much heavier than them so it should actually be compared with Allied heavy tanks like the M26 and IS-2’.
0 kommentar(er)
